I decided to make my last post of EDUC 394 a look at assessment as I learned it through my journey in the education program this past year. This is a long one. Please be patient with this blog as assessment is extremely complicated and all teachers have one way of doing it or another. I will try my hardest to keep away from bias but the opinions of assessment on here are my own and not a tell-all! Please comment your ways of assessment and any other opinions as collaboration between teachers and students is what makes assessment better and more clear! This will make it easier for both teachers and students. 🙂
Assessment comes in many different forms. Lately, we have heard of formative and formal assessments. We have also been introduced to classic assessments such as exams, percentages, and grade scales. But lately, we also have the proficiency scale that rates the students in where they sit on the knowledge and how they understand it rather than a percentage weight within the amount they “need” to know (percentage).
I remember when my school in Mexico tried to change from percentage to letter grades. There was an uproar from parents and teachers. How will I know what my kid knows? Should we do it like in the USA? What does the letter mean? – These were all valid questions. But they all come down to this, what is it that the child knows and how can I compare them to others? Parents loved the percentage as it told them the amount of information their child was able to memorize and the “clear” amount they were missing. Was this true?
It all came down to testing.
Testing for me is a skill. One that was very imperative when it came to my Biomedical degree. We needed the highest grades in order to apply to further education and “be competitive”. Therefore, knowing how to take a test and for what style one particular professor liked was an essential skill. This took away from my love of learning. It became a game of getting the best mark so I can apply to medical school and took all of the joy in how I approached the material. More and more I just became an information-regurgitating machine.
The laboratories were my favourite! I always excelled at hands-on work in chemistry and biology. But my peers were better at memorizing information and they couldn’t process it later. Yet, they got better grades than I did. This didn’t seem fair and it took me a long time to understand the need for all of that.
One of the skills I gained from memorizing information was scaffolding. Which then became important for the higher classes. Which then became important for the labs as I grasped higher concepts better. This type of learning at the end was more difficult for my peers who had only memorized the information for their tests and then forgot about most of it.
This brings me to extrinsic vs intrinsic learning.
According to Charlott Nickerson at SimplyPsychology, “Intrinsic motivation comes from within the individual, while extrinsic motivation comes from outside the individual”.
We need to balance both and count them as learning! One is what we present the student and how we expect them to present their evidence. The other one is the way they approach their learning and how they want to present it.
We need certain balances in our classroom so we keep a good learning culture and do not exhaust our student’s learning ability:
- Do we make final exams the only way of assessing student’s learning?
- Does testing feel like a punishment to the students? or a way to present their knowledge? Should testing only improve their mark?
- We need to separate work habits from learning outcomes. Moreover, they need to be separated from final assessments of knowledge. This can improve our bias in marking students and how we approach their assessment.
- We also need to decouple summative assessment from participation. Some students just do not have the social skills to participate. What have we done to make the culture in the room a safe space to participate? are the students feeling pressured to participate from us? This can hinder their learning and make them feel uncomfortable and unsafe in our space.
- Lastly, what does success look like? Is it really only one paper? one test? one lab? It is important to remember that it is important that the student is enjoying academia and grows love for it as they mature and their scaffolding becomes more intricate.
Differentiated assessment: Triangulation!
Triangulation in assessment: all parts are equally important for the student’s education as a whole.
When we think of triangulation, product-observation-communication (conversation), and how they all fit as a whole.
Triangulation needs these types of expectations:
- The assessment rubric or code needs to be simple, accessible, focused, and with clear expectations
- Record all conversations and observations as part of assessment to compare the different products the students are providing. This can be in the form of reflections or tickets out the door. They do not need to be formal assessments or quizzes only.
- Triangulation needs to express differentiation.
- and it needs to align with the Indigenous Ways of Learning.
Formative assessment vs summative – which one is more important? BOTH!
Formative assessment can be explained as all of the things you do for the student to reach a learning outcome (goal). Summative is the accumulation of all formative assessment evidence presented with a formal assessment (testing, lab, etc.) in order to give the student a grade, usually on the proficiency scale.
The Proficiency Scale
This is how I have learned to see the different types of learning and why they matter. These are for them to know where their learning stands and how to improve.
- Emerging: The student still needs to find their way of learning and how they approach it. Maybe there can be a new way to reach their goals.
- Developing: The student is starting to grasp the concepts but they have opportunities for growth.
- Proficient: The student has enough knowledge of the subject/skill to continue on their own later in life.
- Extending: The student has knowledge of the subject/skill (core competency) and is beyond just knowing the subject but can display connections to other materials and build further.
The proficiency scale allows the student to know where they stand and how they can improve their learning themselves, rather than an amount or percentage of knowledge they need to memorize and repeat. Critical thinking on all subjects can also be replaced with knowledge.
How critically can they think about this material? – When we approach the proficiency scale like that, we better understand the skills the students have to build further later as they approach the material again.
The assessment then is found in the spiral of inquiry as it follows:
The What: assessment
How can I have better assessment practices? or how?
The Hunch: make an assessment plan that fits your teaching goals! -What do we do?
Adapting your assessment to your goals is much easier and has a more organic flow when learning a specific subject. Adapting yourself to a type of assessment for the sake of “how we have done it” can make your learning feel stuck and could leave a disingenuous feeling within yourself and your students.
Take action – set your intentions for learning!
Did the students demonstrate at any point that they knew the material? Is it perhaps the environment in which they are taking the testing that they are not comfortable with and they may have testing anxiety? Does that mean they don’t know the material any less than any other student? Taking a test is a skill, and sometimes one that we can manipulate to do well in tests without actually fully understanding the material.
Check: What is the result of differentiated assessment?
Do we count student’s work (formative) as part of their overall assessment?
If it is not working, try a different approach!
Old ways of assessment are not completely discontinued; they however have taken the same place as other differentiated assessments and they are just as valuable.
My thoughts on the possibilities of why some teachers might hate assessment
- It takes a long time to provide substantive feedback to students about their work instead of just a mark. Sitting with the student and providing feedback is difficult and time-consuming. However, it is the best way to let the students know that we care for them and their learning. Most importantly, how we are providing our knowledge to them and how they can grow theirs most efficiently.
- Reading students’ work that is not meeting expectations reminds teachers that their instructional practices might not be as effective as they might think it is.
We have to remember to provide feedback more often instead of just marks. Give the student the option for self-assessment vs yours. Introspection allows you to reflect on your knowledge and review what has been done. Moreover, they might see where they went wrong, correct it themselves, and understand how to approach the material without hand-holding from the teacher!
Providing marks all the time can feel like a punishment when they get it wrong and not give them a safe space for failure. When doing the work, is it important to get to the right answer alone? in group? only the teacher’s answer? Feedback allows them to find the answer themselves, and then differentiate their learning from the group.
This is the thing I believe the most. Assessment can be fun for the student and the teacher! It is a collaboration between the two of them as much as their learning. The goal of what the student needs to learn cannot be lost and most importantly the student itself!
I like to repeat to myself: Do not be a dream/academic path crusher!
Instill a love for learning in the students and prepare them for whatever will swing their way and how to defend and approach their learning. Those skills are more essential than any amount of information I can repeat over and over from a textbook.